Re: [PATCH 0/5] Version 17, series to add device tree naming to i2c

On 12/19/07, Jon Smirl <[email protected]> wrote:
> Another rework of the i2c for powerpc device tree patch. This version implements standard alias naming only on the powerpc platform and only for the device tree names. The old naming mechanism of i2c_client.name,driver_name is left in place and not changed for non-powerpc platforms. This patch is fully capable of dynamically loading the i2c modules. You can modprobe in the i2c-mpc driver and the i2c modules described in the device tree will be automatically loaded. Modules also work if compiled in.


Are there any further objections to this patch? Can it all go in
through the powerpc trees or do the i2c people want to send it on?

-- 
Jon Smirl
[email protected]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0/5] Version 17, series to add device tree naming to i2c
    • From: "Jean Delvare" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/5] Version 17, series to add device tree naming to i2c
    • From: Jon Smirl <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Exporting capability code/name pairs
• Next by Date: [PATCH] SH/Dreamcast - add support for GD-Rom device
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Version 17, series to add device tree naming to i2c
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Version 17, series to add device tree naming to i2c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]