Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
I don't know.Windows was compliant only with 1.x spec until Vista. With Vista claims are 3.x compliance.
In other words, the 1.x spec is the only thing that matters, at least in the short term (*noone* is giving up XP compatibility at this point.)
-hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Suspend code ordering (again) (was: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: Suspend code ordering (again) (was: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM)
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: Suspend code ordering (again) (was: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: Suspend code ordering (again)
- From: Alexey Starikovskiy <[email protected]>
- Suspend code ordering (again) (was: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM)
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs/autofs: Use time_before, time_before_eq, etc.
- Next by Date: Re: VGA Drivers
- Previous by thread: Re: Suspend code ordering (again)
- Next by thread: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM
- Index(es):
 |