On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:09:57 +0100
Pavel Machek <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat 2007-12-22 12:09:59, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:06:24 +0000
> > memtest86+ does various magic to basically bypass the caches (by
> > disabling them ;-)... Doing that in a live kernel situation, and
> > from userspace to boot...... that's... and issue.
>
> Are you sure? I always assumed that memtest just used patterns bigger
> than L1/L2 caches...
that's... not nearly usable or enough. Caches are relatively smart
about things like use-once.... and they're huge. 12Mb today. You'd need
patterns bigger than 100Mb to get even close to being reasonably
confident that there's nothing left.
> ... and IIRC my celeron testing confirmed it, if
> I disabled L2 cache in BIOS, memtest behave differently.
>
> Anyway, if you can do iopl(), we may as well let you disable caches,
> but you are right, that will need a kernel patch.
and a new syscall of some sorts I suspect; "flush all caches" is a ring
0 operation (and you probably need to do it in an ipi anyway on all
cpus)
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use [email protected]
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
