Re: [PATCH] slub: /proc/slabinfo ABI compatibility

On Dec 24, 2007 9:12 PM, Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmmm... What is the combination of config variables that causes this? I
> moved the count_partial function in mm in order to make the merge of slab
> defrag easier.

I think it's CONFIG_PROC_FS without CONFIG_SYSFS.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] slub: /proc/slabinfo ABI compatibility
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] slub: /proc/slabinfo ABI compatibility
  - From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] slub: /proc/slabinfo ABI compatibility
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] slub: /proc/slabinfo ABI compatibility
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] slub: /proc/slabinfo ABI compatibility
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: 2.6.24-rc6 and earlier: "host bus error" after STR
Next by Date: [PATCH] PNP: add all PNP card device id's as individual aliases
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] slub: /proc/slabinfo ABI compatibility
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] slub: /proc/slabinfo ABI compatibility
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]