Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 20 December 2007, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>
>> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc3/fs/hfs/brec.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.24-rc3.orig/fs/hfs/brec.c
>> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc3/fs/hfs/brec.c
>> @@ -44,10 +44,21 @@ u16 hfs_brec_keylen(struct hfs_bnode *no
>> recoff = hfs_bnode_read_u16(node, node->tree->node_size - (rec + 1) *
>> 2); if (!recoff)
>> return 0;
>> - if (node->tree->attributes & HFS_TREE_BIGKEYS)
>> + if (node->tree->attributes & HFS_TREE_BIGKEYS) {
>> retval = hfs_bnode_read_u16(node, recoff) + 2;
>> - else
>> + if (retval > node->tree->max_key_len + 2) {
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "hfs: keylen %d too large\n",
>> + retval);
>> + retval = HFS_BAD_KEYLEN;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> retval = (hfs_bnode_read_u8(node, recoff) | 1) + 1;
>> + if (retval > node->tree->max_key_len + 1) {
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "hfs: keylen %d too large\n",
>> + retval);
>> + retval = HFS_BAD_KEYLEN;
>> + }
>> + }
>> }
>> return retval;
>> }
>
> You can reuse 0 as failure value, a key has to be of nonzero size.
Ok. Based on the other 0 returns I wasn't sure if they were considered
real errors or not... but also ISTR I ran into problems with a simple 0
return; I probably just to be sure need the callers check for it.
>> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc3/fs/hfs/btree.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.24-rc3.orig/fs/hfs/btree.c
>> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc3/fs/hfs/btree.c
>> @@ -81,6 +81,17 @@ struct hfs_btree *hfs_btree_open(struct
>> goto fail_page;
>> if (!tree->node_count)
>> goto fail_page;
>> + if ((id == HFS_EXT_CNID) && (tree->max_key_len != HFS_MAX_EXT_KEYLEN)) {
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "hfs: invalid extent max_key_len %d\n",
>> + tree->max_key_len);
>> + goto fail_page;
>> + }
>> + if ((id == HFS_CAT_CNID) && (tree->max_key_len != HFS_MAX_CAT_KEYLEN)) {
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "hfs: invalid catalog max_key_len %d\n",
>> + tree->max_key_len);
>> + goto fail_page;
>> + }
>> +
>> tree->node_size_shift = ffs(size) - 1;
>> tree->pages_per_bnode = (tree->node_size + PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1) >>
>> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
>>
>
> I'd prefer a switch statement here.
Ok, I'd thought about doing it that way... :)
> It would be nice if you could do the same changes for hfsplus, so both stay in
> sync.
Yep, wanted to first see if it'd fly for HFS...
Thanks for the feedback,
-Eric
> Thanks.
>
> bye, Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
