Re: [patch 17/20] non-reclaimable mlocked pages

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 23:22:08 +1100
Nick Piggin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Not sure how well that translates to real world workloads, but it
> might help somewhere. Admittedly some of the patches are pretty
> complex...

I like your patch series.

They are completely orthogonal to my patches though, so I
won't tie them together by merging your series into mine :)

It looks like the majority of your patches could go into
-mm right away.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 00/20] VM pageout scalability improvements
    • From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 17/20] non-reclaimable mlocked pages
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 17/20] non-reclaimable mlocked pages
    • From: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 17/20] non-reclaimable mlocked pages
    • From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: x86: Increase PCIBIOS_MIN_IO to 0x1500 to fix nForce 4 suspend-to-RAM
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 00/20] VM pageout scalability improvements
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 17/20] non-reclaimable mlocked pages
• Next by thread: Re: [patch 17/20] non-reclaimable mlocked pages
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]