* Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 0x1500 has been picked here as a nice, round and more conservative
> > value than 0x4000, and which covers 0x142E.
>
> The patch is fine by me, so if anyone has objections, please speak up.
i'm quite nervous about that approach, partly due to the "black magic"
interaction of commit 2ba84684e8c. Could we try to figure out what's
really going on here, instead of playing with a general limit (which
might break other boxes)?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
