Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Al Viro wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:33:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
A couple [minorly] notable wireless bug fixes, and plenty of viro fixes
for obscure issues :)

Heh...  FWIW, forcedeth patch (sent your way about two weeks ago) also
belongs in the same set.  If you need a resend - tell...

I applied it to #upstream (2.6.25) since forcedeth is not on any big-endian platforms AFAIK.

Is it .24 material for some obvious reason, which I missed?  :)


There's another pile in drivers/net/wireless, but that's for linville to
forward when he gets around to it.  Pure annotation patches belong to
past-2.6.24 merge.

I also have starfire and epic100 fixes, but that'll have to wait until
I get around to putting the cards into sparc box (mcast breakage for
starfire and full-driver one for epic100; since nobody had cared for
the latter since 2.3.late, well...)

I have an epic100 card too if you need it (though it sounds like you have something testable).


I think I'll have an ipg fix for you tomorrow, but I want to RTFM first
to make sure that it makes sense.  And there are several interesting
issues in atl1, netxen and cxgb3, but those will have to wait for when
I get around to asking maintainers just what the hell did they mean those
to do.

FWIW, drivers/net is fairly noise-free wrt sparse endianness warnings
in my tree; the main exceptions are prism54 (oid_mgt.c and the nightmares
it pulls) and skfp (AIX-shared vendor driver; 'nuff said, IMO).

Awesome :)


BTW, if you still have any documentation for xircom_cb from your fighting
tulip-related stuff, it would be welcome - there are some oddities with
rx ring handling (assuming that we care about that driver at all and it's
not on the way out, that is).

xircom_tulip_cb should probably be deleted, since it is the crappier of the two drivers for the same hardware (xircom_cb being the other one).

xircom_cb _the driver_ is pretty odd. It is less like tulip than it should be, actually. There are several things that could have been done to improve the throughput/etc. of the driver, but it was more important at the time to simply find a driver that always worked. IIRC its RX filtering was broken, implying the need to enable promisc mode just to receive packets normally.

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux