On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:42:37 -0600 Eric Sandeen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > It would all look a lot more solid if this locking was retained and both
> > ecryptfs_tfm_exists() and ecryptfs_add_new_key_tfm() were designed to be
> > called under key_tfm_list_mutex.
>
> Hmm good point, sorry for missing that. How's this look?
key_tfm_list_mutex gets used in fs/ecryptfs/main.c but it is static in
fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]