Re: [PATCH 1/2] DMA buffer alignment annotations

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 09:39 +0000, Russell King wrote:

> > +#ifndef ARCH_MIN_DMA_ALIGNMENT
> > +#define __dma_aligned
> > +#define __dma_buffer
> > +#else
> > +#define __dma_aligned	  	__attribute__((aligned(ARCH_MIN_DMA_ALIGNMENT)))
> > +#define __dma_buffer		__dma_buffer_line(__LINE__)
> > +#define __dma_buffer_line(line)	__dma_aligned;\
> > +				char __dma_pad_##line[0] __dma_aligned
> 
> You introduce __dma_buffer_line() if ARCH_MIN_DMA_ALIGNMENT is set but
> not if it isn't...

Yup, it's not meant to be used outside of __dma_buffer...

 .../...

> > +then dev->buffer will be safe for DMA on all architectures.  On a
> > +cache-coherent architecture the members of dev will be aligned exactly
> > +as they would have been without __dma_buffer; on a non-cache-coherent
> > +architecture buffer and field2 will be aligned so that buffer does not
> > +share a cache line with any other data.
> > +
> 
> ... but it's not described.  What's the purpose of it, and why would it
> only be used on CPUs with ARCH_MIN_DMA_ALIGNMENT set?

Hrm, I'm not the best at writing exlanations, care to send a patch ? :-)

Cheers,
Ben


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/