On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:00:30 -0700
Bjorn Helgaas <[email protected]> wrote:
> What do you think of something like the following patch? If we do
> this, I don't think we'd need to force pnpacpi=off or change the
> way PNP reserves resources.
>
> I'll be on vacation until about January 2, so I won't be able to
> do much with this until then.
>
>
>
> [patch] it87: request only Environment Controller ports
I'm not qualified to give an opinion on what's proper for the
kernel, so all I can say is that I've applied it (to fresh 2.6.24-rc6
source without Shaohua's pnpacpi patch) and it works nicely for me.
>From /proc/ioports:
0290-029f : pnp 00:01
0290-0294 : pnp 00:01
0295-0296 : it87
0295-0296 : it87
>From dmesg:
system 00:01: ioport range 0x290-0x29f has been reserved
...
system 00:01: ioport range 0x290-0x294 has been reserved
My sensors work.
Thanks for this patch,
Mike Houston
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
