On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 06:46:41AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 08:11:05AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> A slightly microoptimized version 1.1:
>
> ---
> From: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
>
>
> Check the patch level of the single hunks in a patch file, however only when
> checkpatch.pl is called from within the kernel tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
> --
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 579f50f..3eda27b 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -653,6 +653,18 @@ sub CHK {
> }
> }
>
> +sub check_patchlevel {
> +
> + if ($tree) {
> + my ($path) = @_;
> + $path =~ s![^/]*/!!;
> +
> + if (!stat($path)) {
> + WARN("Check the patchlevel (hint: patch option -p)");
> + }
> + }
Hmmm that will trigger on all patches which create new files if I am
grokking you correctly.
I would have thought this would pretty easy to check from the form of
the names. Hmmm.
> +}
> +
> sub process {
> my $filename = shift;
> my @lines = @_;
> @@ -713,10 +725,16 @@ sub process {
> #extract the filename as it passes
> if ($line=~/^\+\+\+\s+(\S+)/) {
> $realfile=$1;
> +
> + if ($realfile) {
> + check_patchlevel($realfile);
> + }
> +
> $realfile =~ s@^[^/]*/@@;
> $in_comment = 0;
> next;
> }
> +
> #extract the line range in the file after the patch is applied
> if ($line=~/^\@\@ -\d+(?:,\d+)? \+(\d+)(,(\d+))? \@\@/) {
> $is_patch = 1;
-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
