Andi Kleen wrote:
Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> writes:
Rank 8: __change_page_attr
BUG at arch/x86/mm/pageattr_64.c:176
Reported 2 times
Reported this week for 2.6.24-rc5; history goes back to 2.6.15
There is no BUG on this line on 2.6.24-rc5. Since there are many
BUG_ONs in this file it is unclear which you mean.
Could you always include the version of the kernel where the actual
oops in the line came from?
in this case this is really all the version information available ;(
it seems to be a patched kernel without patched EXTRAVERSION.
But in the future if I have more specific information (eg it's only 1 kernel version) I'll mention it in more detail.
It gets unwieldy if there's 500 reports for an oops of course ;)
Anyways there are a lot of third party modules who do strange
things with c_p_a(), not always legal, so you might look up out for that
pattern too. Perhaps report the out of tree modules loaded in the
summary too?
I already always will mention if the oops is tainted or not (that I track specifically);
I'll keep an eye out for other non-tainting out of tree modules as well.
Thanks for the suggestions.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
