Re: [PATCH 0/4] add task handling notifier

>Yes, but why export variables? Wouldn't it be better to export 
>an API? 
>
>That simplifies the callers (they all pass "current" as task 
>and "task_notifier_list" as arguments).
>
>It also prevents exposing internal variables (notifier lists 
>ARE internal variables) to modules.
>
>What do you think?

Would be a simple change if the concept itself is generally welcome. Will
first see whether I get other comments requiring re-work.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/4] add task handling notifier
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/4] add task handling notifier
    • From: Ingo Oeser <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] w1-gpio: Add GPIO w1 bus master driver
• Next by Date: [PATCH 0/3 -mm] kexec jump -v8
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/4] add task handling notifier
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/4] add task handling notifier
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]