On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:13:40AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > I'll send it to our DB team to see if this improves our numbers at all. It does, by approximately 0.67%. This is about double the margin of error, and a significant improvement. Thanks! -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ?
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ?
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ?
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ?
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ?
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ?
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ?
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] fix page_alloc for larger I/O segments (improved)
- From: Mark Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fix page_alloc for larger I/O segments (improved)
- From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] fix page_alloc for larger I/O segments (improved)
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ?
- Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- Next by Date: [PATCH] tty: Fix logic change introduced by wait_event_interruptible_timeout()
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] fix page_alloc for larger I/O segments (improved)
- Next by thread: Re: QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ?
- Index(es):
 |