On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 12:06 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:32:25 -0800 Daniel Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 19:04 -0800, Geoff Levand wrote:
> >
> > > Unfortunately there wasn't enough context in the patch to see
> > > that there is a down() earlier in the routine, and that the patch
> > > does indeed remove an incorrectly placed down(). Here is the
> > > entire routine, marked with what the patch removes.
> > >
> >
> > Andrew have you had a chance to review this?
> >
>
> Confused. I did review it: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/18/384
Yeah, but Geoff countered http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/18/409
Do you still think the patch is wrong, given the whole function?
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
