Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog

Kok, Auke wrote:

ok, that's just bad and if there's no user-defineable limit to the deferral I
definately don't like this change.

Can I safely assume that any irq will cause all deferred timers to run?


*on that cpu*. Timers are per cpu, as are interrupts. Just not per se the same one ...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
  - From: Parag Warudkar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
  - From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
  - From: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
  - From: "Kok, Auke" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
  - From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
  - From: "Kok, Auke" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
Next by thread: [PATCH] e1000: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]