On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:08:33PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 02:04:31PM -0500, Tony Camuso wrote: > > Does anybody see a down side to this? > > It'll be slower than it would be if we used mmconfig directly. Now yes, > nobody should be using pci config space in performance critical paths > ... but see the tg3 driver. Use type 1 just for the first 64 bytes and tg3 will be happy. All we need is to avoid touching BARs with mmconfig. Ivan. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- From: Tony Camuso <[email protected]>
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- From: Tony Camuso <[email protected]>
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- References:
- [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- From: Tony Camuso <[email protected]>
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- From: Tony Camuso <[email protected]>
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- From: Loic Prylli <[email protected]>
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- From: Tony Camuso <[email protected]>
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/3] Merge mkimage tool for building uImages
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sky2: Use deferrable timer for watchdog
- Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG]
- Index(es):
 |