Re: not needed patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 20 December 2007 06:29:06 am Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Yinghai Lu <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Ingo.
> > 
> > commit fbdcf18df73758b2e187ab94678b30cd5f6ff9f9 is not needed. another 
> > patch (by you !! commit 699d934d5f958d7944d195c03c334f28cc0b3669 x86: 
> > fixup cpu_info array conversion) already removed clearing of 
> > c->cpu_index. in identify_cpu
> > also it is not consisent to smpboot_32.c. (it will assign id to 
> > cpu_index right after
> >
> >  	*c = boot_cpu_data;
> > )
> 
> well, it might in the worst-case be a superfluous change, but not cause 
> any problems in 2.6.24, right?

now it is ok with 2.6.24.

> 
> > by revert commit fbdcf18df73758b2e187ab94678b30cd5f6ff9f9, we could 
> > use c->cpu_index in identify_cpu.
> 
> but that's 2.6.25 stuff, right? Travis?
or at least before bewfore merging smpboot_32.c and smpboot_64.c

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux