Re: not needed patch

* Mike Travis <[email protected]> wrote:

> >> by revert commit fbdcf18df73758b2e187ab94678b30cd5f6ff9f9, we could 
> >> use c->cpu_index in identify_cpu.
> > 
> > but that's 2.6.25 stuff, right? Travis?
> > 
> 
> Looking at this more closely, yes my change is not needed and should 
> be removed.  I'm not sure what caused my cpu # to be all zeros when I 
> was testing, but it now works ok without my change.

how about this question:

> > well, it might in the worst-case be a superfluous change, but not 
> > cause any problems in 2.6.24, right?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: not needed patch
    • From: Mike Travis <[email protected]>

• References:
  • not needed patch
    • From: Yinghai Lu <[email protected]>
  • Re: not needed patch
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: not needed patch
    • From: Mike Travis <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] Move page_assign_page_cgroup to VM_BUG_ON in free_hot_cold_page
• Previous by thread: Re: not needed patch
• Next by thread: Re: not needed patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]