To all,
The next few forwarded messages comprise my responses to Greg's
questions about the patch I submitted to deal with pci devices
that do not respond correctly to x86 mmconf accesses.
Please accept my apologies for not having including the community
in my original responses.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG: introduce PCI_USING_MMCONF
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:58:45 -0500
From: Tony Camuso <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: Greg KH <[email protected]>
References:
<20071219221746.20362.39243.sendpatchset@dhcp83-188.boston.redhat.com>
<20071219221751.20362.23451.sendpatchset@dhcp83-188.boston.redhat.com>
<[email protected]>
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:17:51PM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
+extern struct pci_ops pci_legacy_ops; /* direct.c */
This isn't needed in this patch at all, and might make the compiler
confused if you were to build with only this patch present :(
thanks,
greg k-h
Yes, of course. I missed that. Thank you.
Should I resubmit that one patch? Or would you prefer I resubmit
the whole patch set?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
