On Dec 19, 2007 8:17 AM, Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> * Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > What's left in processor_32.h and processor_64.h cannot be cleanly
> > integrated. However, it's just a couple of definitions. They are moved
> > to processor.h around ifdefs, and the original files are deleted. Note
> > that there's much less headers included in the final version.
>
> hm, doesnt apply;
>
> Applying patch patches/x86-finish-processor-h-integration.patch
> patching file include/asm-x86/processor.h
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 287.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 311.
> Hunk #4 succeeded at 786 (offset -8 lines).
> 2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file include/asm-x86/processor.h
>
> i fixed it up by hand - the result is below - does it look OK to you?
> (Also, could you check latest x86.git whether i've picked up all your
> patches correctly - the reject might be indicative of some missing
> pieces.)
Your fix is okay. The other patches seems to be all there. The reason
for this is that
it conflicts with Roland's (welcome) i387 patches.
--
Glauber de Oliveira Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net
"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
