Re: [PATCH] x86: __kprobes annotations

* Harvey Harrison <[email protected]> wrote:

> __always_inline on some static functions was to ensure they ended up 
> in the .kprobes.text section. Mark this explicitly.

thanks, applied. I rolled this back into your cleanup patch to make sure 
we have a correct, bisectable kernel at every commit point.

	Ingo 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 3/4] x86: add kprobe-booster to X86_64
    • From: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86: add kprobe-booster to X86_64
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86: add kprobe-booster to X86_64
    • From: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86: add kprobe-booster to X86_64
    • From: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] x86: __kprobes annotations
    • From: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] debugfs: allow access to signed values
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-rc5-mm 3/3] gpiolib: obsolete drivers/i2c/chips/pca9539.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86: __kprobes annotations
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86: add kprobe-booster to X86_64
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]