Hi Jonathan,
(Thanks for the review!)
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> This is a relatively minor detail in the rather bigger context of this
> patch, but...
>
> > @@ -642,6 +644,7 @@ struct inode {
> > struct list_head inotify_watches; /* watches on this inode */
> > struct mutex inotify_mutex; /* protects the watches list */
> > #endif
> > + wait_queue_head_t i_revoke_wait;
>
> That seems like a relatively hefty addition to every inode in the system
> when revoke - I think - will be a fairly rare operation. Would there be
> any significant cost to using a single, global revoke-wait queue instead
> of growing the inode structure?
No, that's a good idea. I'll change it for the next patchset. Thanks!
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
