In message <[email protected]>, Hugh Dickins writes:
> redirty:
> set_page_dirty(page);
> - return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE; /* Return with the page locked */
> + if (wbc->for_reclaim)
> + return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE; /* Return with page locked */
> + unlock_page(page);
> + return 0;
Just curious, but didn't you (or someone else) mention that they wanted to
do away with AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE entirely? If these patches are for
2.6.25, would that be the right time?
Erez.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
