Re: [PATCH] atmel_serial: Split the interrupt handler

Hello Haavard,

> > BTW: Attached I have added a 2nd patch that I use for Preempt-RT. (For
> > cleaner startup, and to get rid of useless IRQ-threads.
>
> Hrm. That assumption isn't valid on AVR32...on AP7000, for example,
> IRQ1 is used by the LCD controller.

In that case, forget that (dirty) patch completely for now. It does
not break things on Preempt-RT, we only will have a IRQ-1 kernel
thread that is never scheduled. (Of which I think is actually a
irq-manage bug, if there are no handlers that are scheduled on that
thread, it should not even start the thread.)

I will verify/test the complete patchset tomorrow.

Kind Regards,

Remy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH] atmel_serial: Split the interrupt handler
  - From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] atmel_serial: Split the interrupt handler
  - From: "Remy Bohmer" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] atmel_serial: Split the interrupt handler
  - From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] dma: passing "attributes" to dma_map_* routines
Next by Date: Re: After many hours all outbound connections get stuck in SYN_SENT
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] atmel_serial: Split the interrupt handler
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] atmel_serial: Split the interrupt handler
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]