Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration

* Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> yes, our include file dependencies are a jungle, the differences between 
>>> 32-bit and 64-bit are arbitrary in 80% of the cases, but still there's no 
>>> reason why this couldnt be done correctly. The patch below is a quick 
>>> bandaid that adds the missing bits.
>>
>> the bandaid didnt work - so i removed the 21/21 patch for the time being.
>
> I will also have updates for other patches, If you want, you can drop 
> the series entirely, and wait for the new one to come

please send delta patches for this lot from now on - those are a lot 
more testable.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 16/21] [PATCH] unify mm_segment_t definition
  - From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 17/21] [PATCH] move definitions to processor.h
  - From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 18/21] [PATCH] unify prefetch operations
  - From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 20/21] [PATCH] move i387 definitions to processor.h
  - From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
  - From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
  - From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix problems due to use of "outb" to port 80 on some AMD64x2 laptops, etc.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]