Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration

* Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> yes, our include file dependencies are a jungle, the differences between 
>>> 32-bit and 64-bit are arbitrary in 80% of the cases, but still there's no 
>>> reason why this couldnt be done correctly. The patch below is a quick 
>>> bandaid that adds the missing bits.
>>
>> the bandaid didnt work - so i removed the 21/21 patch for the time being.
>
> I will also have updates for other patches, If you want, you can drop 
> the series entirely, and wait for the new one to come

please send delta patches for this lot from now on - those are a lot 
more testable.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 16/21] [PATCH] unify mm_segment_t definition
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 17/21] [PATCH] move definitions to processor.h
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 18/21] [PATCH] unify prefetch operations
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 20/21] [PATCH] move i387 definitions to processor.h
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
    • From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: fix problems due to use of "outb" to port 80 on some AMD64x2 laptops, etc.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 21/21] [PATCH] finish processor.h integration
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]