Re: [PATCH v2] x86: unify module_{32|64}.h

* Harvey Harrison <[email protected]> wrote:

> >From 5be3fc6a0e28d82a05487a8fb1a86532fb0ad4e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:58:10 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] x86: unify module_{32|64}.h
> 
> This adds one case to the MODULE_PROC_FAMILY block testing
> for X86_64.  There are no new things defined on X86_64 than
> there were before.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>
> ---
> Ingo, let a single checkpatch warning go by in the first one,
> fixed in this version.

thanks, applied.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH v2] x86: unify module_{32|64}.h
    • From: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 7/21] [PATCH] unify common parts of processor.h
• Next by Date: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected -- pm-suspend/5800 is trying to acquire lock
• Previous by thread: [PATCH v2] x86: unify module_{32|64}.h
• Next by thread: [PATCH] dmi: Let drivers walk the DMI table
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]