On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:14:42 +0100
"Remy Bohmer" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Haavard,
>
> > Please note that I'm not trying to steal the show here -- I just want
>
> That did not even come to my mind at all...
> I am happy with everything that helps making this driver better.
Good :)
> What shall we do first from here, splitup of the interrupt handler? Or
> DMA patch?
I currently have the patches applied in the order you sent them, with my
stuff wedged in between (thanks to git-rebase --interactive.) So I
think it makes sense to do the interrupt handler splitup first, even
though I personally care more about the DMA patch.
Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
