Re: [PATCH v2] atmel_serial: Clean up the code

On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:14:42 +0100
"Remy Bohmer" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Haavard,
> 
> > Please note that I'm not trying to steal the show here -- I just want
> 
> That did not even come to my mind at all...
> I am happy with everything that helps making this driver better.

Good :)

> What shall we do first from here, splitup of the interrupt handler? Or
> DMA patch?

I currently have the patches applied in the order you sent them, with my
stuff wedged in between (thanks to git-rebase --interactive.) So I
think it makes sense to do the interrupt handler splitup first, even
though I personally care more about the DMA patch.

Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH v2] atmel_serial: Clean up the code
    • From: steve birtles <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH v2] atmel_serial: Clean up the code
    • From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH v2] atmel_serial: Clean up the code
    • From: "Remy Bohmer" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: [PATCH] sata_nv: fix ADMA ATAPI issues with memory over 4GB (v3)
• Next by Date: [PATCH] x86: unify extable_{32|64}.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] atmel_serial: Clean up the code
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] atmel_serial: Clean up the code
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]