Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

From: Chris Newport <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:58:29 +0000 (GMT)

> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Stefan Richter wrote:
> 
> > It's a 100% reproducible oops on Sparc (with FireWire controller) for
> > 2.6.23 and 2.6.24 kernels, but not 2.6.22.  The reporter confirmed that
> > the bug also happens
> 
> How do you achieve a sparc system with firewire ?
> AFAIK there is no SBUS firewire card.

He means sparc64, which have PCI firewire onboard many
systems.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
  - From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
  - From: Chris Newport <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: [PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2 2.6.25] cxgb3 - parity initialization for T3C adapters.
Previous by thread: Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
Next by thread: [PATCH] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c (version 4)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]