Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-rc5-mm 3/3] gpiolib: obsolete drivers/i2c/chips/pca9539.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well, I guess it would be a smooth path if we rename the
drivers/i2c/chips/pca9539.c
since that's old style I2C driver, which means the driver name is not
so useful external
so the impact is actually minimum.


On Dec 18, 2007 4:29 AM, Jean Delvare <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:09:53 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > > Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:33:27 +0800
> > > From: "eric miao" <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > for the following reasons:
> > >
> > > 1. there is currently no known users of this driver
> > >
> > > 2. the functionality of this driver is well supported with the recent
> > >    proposed drivers/gpio/pca9539.c, using GPIO_LIB
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: eric miao <[email protected]>
> > > Acked-by: Ben Gardner <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/i2c/chips/pca9539 |   47 --------
> > >  drivers/i2c/chips/Kconfig       |   10 --
> > >  drivers/i2c/chips/Makefile      |    1 -
> > >  drivers/i2c/chips/pca9539.c     |  196 ----------------------------------
> >
> > Jean, do you sign off on this?  In any case I think this should
> > be going through your I2C patches.
> >
> > I'd be a trifle uneasy just deleting this, because it's possible
> > there are *unknown* users ... and also because nobody's yet done
> > a userspace interface to the gpiolib infrastructure.  (It seems
> > to be the usual case of nobody wanting such a thing quite enough
> > to write the code.)
> >
> > I'd be more comfortable marking it as obsolete and flagging it
> > for removal a release or two after Eric's new version merges ...
> > though maybe that's just paranoia.
>
> I'm fine with this and I agree that it would be safer, however please
> note that both drivers are mutually exclusive because they have the
> same name, meaning that deprecating the old driver is not enough, you
> also need Kconfig magic to make sure that both drivers aren't built at
> the same time. Or alternatively the old driver could be renamed... I
> don't really care myself, I'll take whatever patch you or Eric submit.
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
>



-- 
Cheers
- eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux