Re: Top kernel oopses/warnings this week

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds wrote:

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
+char *get_boot_uuid(void)
+{
+	static char target[38];
+	unsigned char *uuid;
+
+	if (sysctl_bootid[8] == 0)
+		generate_random_uuid(sysctl_bootid);
+	/* sysctl_bootid is signed, to print we need unsigned .. */
+	uuid = sysctl_bootid;
+
+	if (target[0] == 0) {
+		sprintf(target, "%02x%02x%02x%02x-%02x%02x-%02x%02x-%02x%02x-"
+			"%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x",

Why isn't *everything* inside that "if (target[0] == 0" check?

the sysctl_bootid is shared with the /proc exposed bootid, so I need to generate it the same way

I'd _also_ suggest that you'd actually try to avoid that horrid sequence of "%02x..", and instead just make sure that sysctl_bootid[] is 4-byte aligned, and then you can do

	sprintf("%08x-%04x-%04x-%04x-%04x%08x",
		ntohl(0[(u32 *)uuid]),
		ntohs(2[(u16 *)uuid]),
		ntohs(3[(u16 *)uuid]),
		ntohs(4[(u16 *)uuid]),
		ntohs(5[(u16 *)uuid]),
		ntohl(3[(u32 *)uuid]));

which also gets bonus points for being totally unreadable, and thus 100% in the spirit of uuid's.

again.. this is for compatibility with /proc/sys/kernel/random/boot_id .. the code 10 lines below my patch is identical and does
the %02x stuff... I didn't make that up, I just copied that to get the same output.
I can deviate for cleanup... but I can see some value of being the same format and same data.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux