Re: [PATCH] x86-64: also define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH

* Jan Beulich <[email protected]> wrote:

> >>> Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> 17.12.07 14:42 >>>
> >
> >* Jan Beulich <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> The patch introducing this left out x86-64, despite it also having 
> >> extra entries.
> >
> >thanks, applied. Is there any 2.6.24 urgency for this?
> 
> While I haven't seen x86-64 to break due to this (it appears that 
> 32-bit apps would be more susceptible), I know that we had major 
> problems with the respective piece missing from the 32-bit Xen kernels 
> in openSuSE 10.3, so I would strongly suggest putting this into .24.

ok, queued it up for the next push.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] x86-64: also define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86-64: also define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86-64: also define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH
    • From: "Jan Beulich" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: also define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Add GD-Rom support to the SEGA Dreamcast
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: also define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH
• Next by thread: [PATCH] x86: resolve hidden patch conflict in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]