Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: Final unification of local_{32|64}.h

* Harvey Harrison <[email protected]> wrote:

> No differences except for the defintion of local_add_return on X86_64. 
> The X86_32 version is just fine as it is protected with ifdef 
> CONFIG_M386 so use it directly.

thanks, i've applied your 4 patches to x86.git.

btw., now that we have a single unified file, it might make sense to fix 
these checkpatch complaints:

  total: 10 errors, 1 warnings, 257 lines checked

in case you are interested ;-)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: Final unification of local_{32|64}.h
    • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 4/4] x86: Final unification of local_{32|64}.h
    • From: Harvey Harrison <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.
• Next by Date: [PATCH] [RFC] be more verbose when probing EDD
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 4/4] x86: Final unification of local_{32|64}.h
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: Final unification of local_{32|64}.h
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]