> > On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 00:27 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > On Sunday 16 December 2007 00:18:43 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > Well, the only problem with that is I suspect there are some "newer" cards that > > > > work better with v3 firmware, although they are supposed to support both. > > > > Impossible. The firmware is only the MAC. > > OK I should probably mention though that of course it is (in theory!) possible that the card works better with bcm43xx, it just never has happened for all I know. johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- [PATCH 1/3] ps3: vuart: fix error path locking
- From: Daniel Walker <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex
- From: Michael Buesch <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex
- From: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 1/3] ps3: vuart: fix error path locking
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex
- Next by Date: Re: [RANDOM] Move two variables to read_mostly section to save memory
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex
- Index(es):