On 12/14/2007 05:17 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: >> so do whatever is necessary to enable dynticks. > > dynticks' main purpose is to save power, but C1e saves more power. > Disabling C1e for dynticks would be a fairly useless default > trade off. > What about machines where the BIOS has disabled C1e on CPU 0 but left it enabled on CPU 1 ?? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)
- From: Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)
- References:
- [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)
- From: Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)
- From: Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 11/11] drivers/net/usb/catc.c: Use print_mac
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] PAT 64b: PAT support for X86_64
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Option to disable AMD C1E (allows dynticks to work)
- Index(es):