Re: What happened to this patch? (Re: [BUG] panic after umount (biscted))

On Thu, Dec 13 2007, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> 
> I was going through my set of kernel patches that I've cherry picked on
> LKML for my private kernel, and I noticed this hasn't gotten merged into
> mainline yet.   The original thread was here:
> 
> 	 http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/27/61
> 
> and addressed a panic after a umount reported by Sebastian Siewior.  Was
> this addressed in some other way?

Yes, the below wasn't a proposal for inclusion, the problem got fixed
differently by commit 51fd77bd9f512ab6cc9df0733ba1caaab89eb957

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- What happened to this patch? (Re: [BUG] panic after umount (biscted))
  - From: "Theodore Ts'o" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Print taint info in more places.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH REVISED] Avoid overflows in kernel/time.c
Previous by thread: What happened to this patch? (Re: [BUG] panic after umount (biscted))
Next by thread: 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 -- drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_clut224.c:598: error: conflicting type qualifiers for ‘logo_linux_clut224’
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]