Re: Fix implicit declaration in via-pmu.c

On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 02:01:20PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
 > Dave Jones writes:
 > 
 > > drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c: In function 'register_pmu_pm_ops':
 > > drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c:2481: error: implicit declaration of function 'pm_set_ops'
 > 
 > What tree is this against?  I don't see any occurrences of pmu_pm_ops
 > in either 2.6.23 or Linus' current tree, or in my published
 > powerpc.git tree.

*grmbl*, it's on top of a bunch of other ppc suspend bits.
I blame dwmw2.

You can safely drop this.   Thanks.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Fix implicit declaration in via-pmu.c
  - From: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
- Re: Fix implicit declaration in via-pmu.c
  - From: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Fix implicit declaration in via-pmu.c
Next by Date: 2.6.24-rc2-rt1 build failure: mod_unreg_security
Previous by thread: Re: Fix implicit declaration in via-pmu.c
Next by thread: RFC: remove __read_mostly
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]