Re: [PATCH] avoid ifdefs in desc.h, getting rid of pack_ldt and pack_tss

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
Well, "no functional changes" is not quite the same thing as "no object code changes".

yeah, true, but the safest way to ensure no functional changes is to get identical object code. In sched-devel.git i include obj comparisons to cleanup patches as a self-assurance (and later bughunt helper) to make sure a cleanup is really just a cleanup.

Of course. "No object code changes" is a stronger statement, however, not all types of cleanups result in that.

Which is the case here. I wasn't expecting the same object code. Anyway, the mistake is explained, and I'm about to send the correct version. Sorry again.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux