Re: [RESULTS] Port 0x80 I/O speed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RESULTS] Port 0x80 I/O speed
From: David Newall <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:55:04 +1030
Cc: Rene Herman <[email protected]>, Linux Kernel <[email protected]>, Chris Holvenstot <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
List-id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070221 SeaMonkey/1.1.1

linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote:

But there are some things that get set up long before
udelay() is calibrated! The interrupt controllers,
the timer, etc. You can't just substitute or you
will end up with machines that won't boot!


The initial value could be set conservatively high.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [RESULTS] Port 0x80 I/O speed
  - From: Rene Herman <[email protected]>
- Re: [RESULTS] Port 0x80 I/O speed
  - From: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] videobuf-core.c locking fixes
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: Remove all definitions with fastcall
Previous by thread: Re: [RESULTS] Port 0x80 I/O speed
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] power: remove POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY_LEVEL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux