Re: [PATCH 0/6] paravirt patches - the non-integration part

* Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> This series corresponds do older patches in the paravirt series that 
> was neither already applied, nor I will touch again. In general, they 
> do not touch code that can be unified (at least, without being the 
> unification a big problem on its own).
> 
> They passed through this list a lot of times, so I feel them ready for 
> inclusion, unless someone opposes.
> 
> As with the other patches, they apply to the top of linux-2.6-x86:mm

thanks, i've picked them up into x86.git, they look certainly very 
clean.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 0/6] paravirt patches - the non-integration part
  - From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 20/30] blk_end_request: changing xsysace (take 4)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/19] desc_struct integration
Previous by thread: [PATCH 6/6] prepare x86_64 architecture initialization for paravirt
Next by thread: Kernel friendly chipsets - video drivers - nVidia vs. AMD 690G
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]