On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 06:06:45PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> Thats not enough You still need to fix code in ll_rw_blk(), I would
> define a rq_flags_bio_match_mask = 0xf for that.
> (and also add what Jens called "needed" with the
> BIO_RW_AHEAD selects REQ_FAILFAST.)
Yes, I appreciate it's not enough; that's why I didn't sign-off on it.
Nobody currently sets BIO_RW_AHEAD, so I don't understand why we need to
do anything ;-)
> And I still don't understand why, for example, "Domain Validation" fails
> with the original patch. What sets BIO_RW_FAILFAST and than panics
> on Errors?
> (All I see is this flag set in dm/multipath.c & dm-mpath.c)
No idea ...
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
