El Wed, 12 Dec 2007 01:16:06 +0100
Rene Herman <[email protected]> escribió:
> On 12-12-07 01:09, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
[...]
>
> Great, thanks much for reporting. Sort of interesting in itself that without
> -O2 you do still get correct results on 64-bit but for some other time.
>
> You're the first one to go significantly below 1 us it seems.
:( I have seen the other msg and i have to say that the tests where done at
1GHz not at full speed. At full speed i see
cycles: out 3025, in 1653
cycles: out 3040, in 1708
cycles: out 3044, in 1650
cycles: out 3034, in 1652
cycles: out 3035, in 1652
cycles: out 3037, in 1652
cycles: out 3043, in 1709
cycles: out 3032, in 1648
cycles: out 3039, in 1652
cycles: out 3041, in 1652
cycles: out 3048, in 1704
cycles: out 3040, in 1650
cycles: out 3023, in 1631
cycles: out 3036, in 1652
cycles: out 3042, in 1706
cycles: out 3047, in 1708
cycles: out 3047, in 1711
cycles: out 3036, in 1652
>
> Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
