On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict between acpi and
> the pnp requested regions in your patch which result in the acpi_thermal code
> to read the wrong (0xff) temperature value and halt the machine, but i might be
> wrong on the details since acpi is such a big code chunk to swallow.
I don't see any obvious conflict from the log you posted. For the sake
of comparison, can you post the corresponding dmesg log after you removed
the patch?
acpi_thermal_get_temperature() only evaluates _TMP, which isn't very
interesting. I wonder if there's some conflict between that AML method
and the EC driver or something.
If you can also collect the DSDT, maybe I can poke around in there and
see what _TMP is really doing.
Thanks,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
