Re: [PATCH 0/6] Use two zonelists per node instead of multiple zonelists v11r2

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:21:57 +0000 (GMT)
Mel Gorman <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is a rebase of the two-zonelist patchset to 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 and some
> warnings cleared up.

Sorry, but I don't think I'll be looking at anything which looks like it
isn't a bugfix for a while.

I'm swamped in regressions (and everyone else should be too) but also we
need to look at why there were so many regressions - people jamming way too
much inadequately tested stuff into the 2.6.24 merge window.  The only way
we can fix that is to merge less stuff and to more carefully review and
test the things which we _do_ plan on merging.

Part of that process is for me to get more -mm kernels out and to test them
more and to encourage more people to test them and to report and fix
problems.  But I've hardly looked at the -mm queue in a week because of
2.6.24 regressions.

argh.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/6] Use two zonelists per node instead of multiple zonelists v11r2
    • From: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: + revert-hibernation-enter-platform-hibernation-state-in-a-consistent-way.patch added to -mm tree
• Next by Date: Re: broken dpt_i2o in 2.6.23 (was: ext2_check_page: bad entry in directory) (fwd)
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 6/6] Filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Use two zonelists per node instead of multiple zonelists v11r2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]