Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:27:17 +0100
Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> * Dor Laor <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> The patch below should resolve this - could you please test and Ack
> it? But this CPUID was present in v2.6.23 too, so why did it only
> show up in 2.6.24-rc for you?

isn't this probably wrong since this code is also used in the vsyscall code..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync
    • From: Dor Laor <[email protected]>
  • Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64 with MCP51 laptops
• Next by Date: Re: (RESEND) [PATCH/HP6xx/HP7xx] Cleanup drivers/input/keyboard|touchscreen Kconfigs
• Previous by thread: Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync
• Next by thread: Re: Performance overhead of get_cycles_sync
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]