Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4

* Jie Chen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi, Ingo:
>
> I guess it is a good news. I did patch 2.6.21.7 kernel using your cfs 
> patch. The results of pthread_sync is the same as the non-patched 
> 2.6.21 kernel. This means the performance of is not related to the 
> scheduler. As for overhead of the gettimeofday, there is no difference 
> between 2.6.21 and 2.6.24-rc4. The reference time is around 10.5 us 
> for both kernel.

could you please paste again the relevant portion of the output you get 
on a "good" .21 kernel versus the output you get on a "bad" .24 kernel?

> So what is changed between 2.6.21 and 2.6.22? Any hints :-). Thank you 
> very much for all your help.

we'll figure it out i'm sure :)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
    • From: Jie Chen <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
    • From: Jie Chen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
    • From: Jie Chen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
    • From: Jie Chen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
    • From: Jie Chen <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
  • Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
    • From: Jie Chen <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC] Proposed new directory layout for kvm and virtualization
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC][POWERPC] Provide a way to protect 4k subpages when using 64k pages
• Previous by thread: Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
• Next by thread: Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]