Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> wrote: > the frequency of both cores is the maximum of what linux sets each core to; Do you mean that the cpufreq code can be confused about the actual frequency of the cores? That sounds like a big problem. Thanks for any insight. -- Guillaume -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- References:
- 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: Stefano Brivio <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: Please revert: PCI: fix IDE legacy mode resources
- Next by Date: Re: Please revert: PCI: fix IDE legacy mode resources
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- Index(es):