On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Alan Cox wrote: > > And as I keep pointing out but you keep ignoring - not doing it breaks > even more things, by a factor of quite a lot. But we've never done it before in libata, right? So the "not doing it breaks" argument is about stuff that isn't regressions. Can you really not see the difference? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- Prev by Date: Re: Kernel BUG in 2.6.23.9
- Next by Date: [PATCH] x86-64: also define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23
- Index(es):
 |