Re: [PATCH git-sched 1/3] no need for 'affine wakeup' balancing in select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu

* Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]>
> 
> No need to do a check for 'affine wakeup and passive balancing 
> possibilities' in select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu.
> 
> I guess, this part got missed upon introduction of per-sched_class 
> select_task_rq() in try_to_wake_up().

thanks, applied.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH git-sched 1/3] no need for 'affine wakeup' balancing in select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu
    • From: Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] x64/page.h: convert some macros to inlines
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH, cleaun-up git-sched 2/3] get rid of 'new_cpu' in try_to_wake_up()
• Previous by thread: [PATCH git-sched 1/3] no need for 'affine wakeup' balancing in select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu
• Next by thread: [PATCH 1/1] fix 2.6.24-rc1 nfs_file_mmap change for NOMMU
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]