Re: [PATCH git-sched 1/3] no need for 'affine wakeup' balancing in select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu

* Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]>
> 
> No need to do a check for 'affine wakeup and passive balancing 
> possibilities' in select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu.
> 
> I guess, this part got missed upon introduction of per-sched_class 
> select_task_rq() in try_to_wake_up().

thanks, applied.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH git-sched 1/3] no need for 'affine wakeup' balancing in select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu
  - From: Dmitry Adamushko <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] x64/page.h: convert some macros to inlines
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH, cleaun-up git-sched 2/3] get rid of 'new_cpu' in try_to_wake_up()
Previous by thread: [PATCH git-sched 1/3] no need for 'affine wakeup' balancing in select_task_rq_fair() when task_cpu(p) == this_cpu
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/1] fix 2.6.24-rc1 nfs_file_mmap change for NOMMU
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]